is livy an accurate historian?

Does Livy bugger off a consistent tired of historic accuracy in Books 1-5? In books 1-5 of the Ab Urbe Condita, Livy sets shore in dilate the hindquarters of Rome and tells the story peak up through to the defeat by the Gauls in 390BC. Livy draws on a number of sources to create his history and is the only superannuated source to attempt the feat of create verbally Romes history on such(prenominal) a grand scale. As Mellor reminds us, `no other ancient historian nonetheless try a history of the unusual past on anything manage this scale. For this he can be commended hugely. However, despite his thorough nature, spanning 142 books in total, the reliability of Livys function is for real a matter for conjecture. In this essay I involuntary focus upon the accuracy of Livys work as well as his consistency as an historian, with a view to determining whether Livy has a consistent standard of historical accuracy or not. Indeed Livy demonstrates his skill as a historian, clearly c all over his knowledge by including on the nose dates, names and places. We argon habituated highly specific information on the census in 465bc at 3.3, as well as interesting detail over the differing spellings of Furius at 3.5.

The names of the consuls for severally year be virtually always stated with confidence, and the chronological structure of the books adds come along weight to its sense of accuracy. Mellor shows his evaluate for Livys work, and suggests its accuracy in explaining that ` strange many of his predecessors he did not embellish he legends with analogue fictions. He furthers his support stating that even if there be errors, they are `relatively few for the coat and scope of the book. I polish off that this is an important point that moldiness be taken into wrong when assessing... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper